Tina Swithin founded the online organization, One Mom’s Battle (OMB). OMB intentions are to defame our Family Court System, deny the phenomenon of parental alienation, and attack the professionals who dedicate their careers to protecting children. Swithin is motivated by money and popularity.
Swithin’s lies have aroused skepticism and have induced several state legislatures to pass anti-alienation laws that result in harm to children.
Two important truths about Swithin are discussed here:
- Swithin harms children
- Swithin interferes with Court orders to help alienated children.
FURTHER READING: Tina Swithin’s Behaviors Are Harmful to Alienated Children
Tina Swithin Is Not an Authority on Parental Alienation
Swithin is completely unqualified to offer valid opinions about parental alienation.
- Swithin is not a licensed clinician.
- Swithin lacks even a basic understanding of the family phenomenon of alienation.
- Swithin has not trained or studied about alienation with a qualified specialist.
- Swithin has not provided any proof or documentation of having attended nor completed any professional workshops or seminars about alienation.
- Swithin has not passed a Voir Dire challenge about parental alienation.
- Swithin has not passed a Daubert challenge on her knowledge about parental alienation.
Tina Swithin Falsely Reports About Parental Alienation
Swithin’s deceptive and defamatory reporting about alienation fails to cite the Court findings and orders regarding the alienation cases she is criticizing. This is hardly surprising given Swithin’s biased, self-serving agenda.
Omitted from Swithin’s reporting is that the Courts have found the alienating parent to be an abusive parent and the alienated parent to be a safe, protective parent.
Swithin does not interview the alienated parent nor report about the alienated parent’s perspective on the family dynamics. Doing so would utterly undermine Swithin’s entire false narrative.
FURTHER READING: Will the Real Tina Swithin Please Stand Up – Experts Inquire
Tina Swithin Harms Children
Swithin harms children by using them to promote her self-serving goals. Her damaging actions leave alienated children as collateral damage.
- She promotes and supports alienating parents to involve their children in the violation of Court orders.
- She recruits minor children to come forward to report negatively about their reunification therapy experience.
Swithin did not report about her involvement in a case in which a child was kidnapped from the alienated parent. The kidnapping prevented the child from participating in a Court-ordered reunification program with the alienated parent.
Swithin did not report about her involvement in another case in which she facilitated the kidnapping of two minor children from their alienated parent. The children were assisted in making a video in which they falsely accused their alienated parent and the reunification program of abuse. The alienated parent had sole legal custody and did not authorize the making and publicizing of the video.
Swithin did not report about her involvement in several cases in which she aided in alerting the press about the time and place of the Court-ordered transition of the children. This resulted in a public media circus that terrorized and exploited the children. With Swithin’s coaching, the alienating parent encouraged the children to become hysterical and severely act-out during the transition.
What Is Parental Alienation?
Parental alienation is an abusive family dynamic in which a parent brainwashes a child to reject the other parent. The rejected parent has been found by the Court to be a safe, protective, and loving parent. The rejection is completely unjustified and anti-instinctual.
FURTHER READING: Tina Swithin’s Harmful Lies About Reunification Camps
Conclusion
Tina Swithin is not motivated by “the child’s best interests.” If she were, she would not aid in orchestrating the media blitzes of custody transfers, advertise for minor children to report their alienation stories, facilitate the kidnapping of alienated children in defiance of Court orders, and publicly expose children’s identities in her online posts.
Tina Swithin self-describes as an advocate who promotes child protection. To the contrary, Swithin’s self-serving agenda delays Court orders for safe and effective treatment to heal the child abuse being committed by alienating parents.
